No witness saw him being punched.
No witness saw his head being slammed in to the sidewalk.
No witness saw him being suffocated.
No witness saw him screaming.
How did he get soooo unlucky?
The prosecution concedes he was punched. The evidence supports it
The injuries to the back of his head support GZ's testimony.
The lower volume of the last few screams supports the GZ's testimony ( once again GZ's persuasive
testimony - given immediately after the incident)
The comparative injuries ( or lack thereof ) establish George as the screamer as do W6 testimony that Martin was totally in control of George.
Where is the evidence or witnesses supporting the contrary for the same four points?
It seems that you admit that no witnesses support your key contentions. Then you conveniently ignore the witnesses and evidence that contradict them.
I think your unlucky
to have invested emotional capital attempting to support such a thin soup of conjecture.
Did you ever post under the member name of PB?