The more I think on it, Crump seems to have weaseled his way into Serino's brain at a very early stage of the investigation. If you're trying to finesse the "intentional acts" exclusion of a liability insurance policy, you would, of course, try to frame the issue in terms of negligence theory, You might, by way of example, stress that the event setting the dominoes to falling was "avoidable," or could otherwise have been "defused."