from: DebFrmHell on Today at 12:05:17 AM
That is so much better!!!! Thank you a thousand times over. I am all kinds of fascinated by the things you can do. For a conservative, you are the tops! 8-) You, Obi-Wan and Chip.
Okay. You can see cars going south on TTL. There are a couple of them around the 7:07 mark. As they go around the last bend near W11/20's TH you can see them pass if you are looking at the street lamp. (middle light) There is a definite void as they pass behind it.
At 7:11:29 a vehicle goes down TTL but you don't see him pass behind the street lamp. Could that be Zimmerman?
Seriously. This needs it's own thread. Perhaps in the evidence thread?
From Diwata Man:
YW. I would think it would need it's own thread considering it's not DeeDee rather CCTV evidence we are talking about. This particular clubhouse shot, among all the other videos of the clubhouse, has always been a topic of discussion around the nets. But let me say this while we are here.
nomatter_nevermind recently posted a link to a long 45 minute video in where they discuss this and other clubhouse video.http://forums.talkleft.com/index.php/topic,2161.msg105716.html#msg105716
In the video they believe that is George's truck. I once believed it to be as well for just the reason you mention "At 7:11:29 a vehicle goes down TTL but you don't see him pass behind the street lamp"
They also mention other video where one can see a vehicle pass the front of the clubhouse and it does look like a truck and the timing is very close.
The biggest problem in all of this will always be that we can't say definitively that is George's truck, the quality of the video is just too bad. Also I think it may be possible for a vehicle to pass the front of the clubhouse and even park without being seen on the camera. I also think it may be possible for a car to travel South then East down Twin Trees and not be seen if it stays on the North side of the street because of the blown out area. Of course I can't say with certainty without actually going there and conducting some tests.
In the end I think that no matter what one side or the other brings up regarding the video the other side can say the same to the other. The quality is just to bad to discern much of anything. Also, just how accurate was the time accounted for? Did the investigator merely look at his watch? Was it checked against NIST? If that's what they used? You get the idea.