I keep on telling Yman on the main TL site and Susan Simpson on her site that you can ignore all of Zimmerman's statements and have plenty of reasonable doubt about his guilt. They keep replying no, no, no, they jury will regard Zimmerman's credibility as all important in assessing his self defense claim. Of course talking heads, like Marcia Clark, have said the same thing on TV. Didn't Guy ask a question today like, "Why would he lie if he weren't guilty?". I don't attempt to explain all misstatements as due to trauma. I think his desire to make his self defense case more believable, boost his self image and being in denial about the objective foolishness of some of his actions, also have something to do with it. I can't understand why some people think that means I think he is guilty.