"That's where I felt confused, where if a person kills someone, then you get charged for it," Maddy said. "But as the law was read to me, if you have no proof that he killed him intentionally, you can't say he's guilty."
I am not sure what she means by "intentionally". In the definition of manslaughter, the instructions state,
"2. George Zimmerman intentionally committed an act or acts that caused the death of Trayvon Martin".
I thought that all the jurors believed 2. was established but saw that the excusable homicide and justifiable homicide parts of the jury instructions overrode the manslaughter elements in this particular case. I have a hunch that watching the program won't explain anything further.
So why does she need a lawyer? What excuse does the jury consultant have for not striking her?